Transformative Islam and Ibn Khaldun’s Ethical ‘Aṣabīyah: A Decolonial Analysis by Syed Farid Alatas
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the reconstruction of Ibn Khaldun’s concept of ‘aṣabīyah through Syed Farid Alatas’s post-Khaldunian and decolonial approach and explores its relationship with transformative Islam. It aims to recover the broader social, moral, religious, and political dimensions of ‘aṣabīyah and to develop ethical ‘aṣabīyah as the authors’ conceptual reconstruction for contemporary social analysis. Using qualitative content analysis, the study examines al-Muqaddimah together with Alatas’s major works through interpretive comparison of key conceptual statements. The findings show that ‘aṣabīyah is not limited to tribal solidarity, but functions as a social force related to cohesion, political power, religion, and civilization. Ethical ‘aṣabīyah is formulated as solidarity directed by justice, public responsibility, and the common good. Corruption, declining public trust, and institutional fragility are discussed as contemporary illustrations of how ethical ‘aṣabīyah can be applied to interpret moral and institutional problems in modern society. This article argues that ethical ‘aṣabīyah can be connected with transformative Islam through justice, social criticism, liberation, social agency, praxis, and the ethical role of religion.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Alagha, Joseph. “Ibn Khaldun: A Sociology of History.” International Sociology 32, no. 2 (2017): 180–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580916687460.
Alatas, Syed Farid. Applying Ibn Khaldūn: The Recovery of a Lost Tradition in Sociology. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203093597.
Alatas, Syed Farid. Ibn Khaldun. Makers of Islamic Civilization. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Ardıç, Nurullah. “Khaldunian Studies Today: The Contributions of Syed Farid Alatas.” Journal of Historical Sociology 30, no. 1 (2017): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12156.
El-Aswad, El-Sayed. “Post-Asabiyya: Ibn Khaldun and the Discourse of Reform: Part One.” Tabsir: Insight on Islam and the Middle East, May 22, 2006. https://tabsir.net/?p=16.
Erman, Mulyadi, and Junaidi. “Dynamics of Power and Politics in Ibn Khaldun’s Social Philosophy.” Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization 2, no. 3 (2024): 233–45. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v2i03.1081.
Fitria, Norma, and Miftahul Khairani. “Revisiting Transformative Islam: A Critical Note on the Current Indonesian Muslim.” Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies 10, no. 1 (2022): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.32332/nizham.v10i1.4613.
Fuad, Ahmad Nur. “Examining Khaldunian Perspective for Analyzing Indonesia’s Historical Dynamics.” Journal of Islamic Historical Review 1, no. 1 (2026): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15642/jihr.2026.1.1.1-17
Halim, Asyiqin Abdul, Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor, Ahmad Zaki Berahim Ibrahim, and Faisal Ahmad Faisal Abdul Hamid. “Ibn Khaldun’s Theory of ‘Asabiyyah and Its Application in Modern Muslim Society.” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 11, no. 9 (2012): 1232–37. https://idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr11%289%2912/11.pdf.
Hilmy, Masdar, and Hammis Syafaq. “In Search for Muslim Ethics of Calvinism: Improving the Quality of Public Life through the Incorporation of Religious Narratives into the State Policies in Indonesia.” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 18, no. 2 (2024): 49–74. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2024.18.2.49-74.
Ibn Khaldun. Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldun. Translated by Ahmadie Thoha. 5th printing. Jakarta: Pustaka Firdaus, 2005.
Ibn Khaldun. The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History. Translated by Franz Rosenthal. 2nd ed. 3 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967.
Mahdi, Muhsin. Ibn Khaldûn’s Philosophy of History: A Study in the Philosophic Foundation of the Science of Culture. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1957.
Malešević, Siniša. “Where Does Group Solidarity Come from? Gellner and Ibn Khaldun Revisited.” Thesis Eleven 128, no. 1 (2015): 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513615587415.
Mayring, Philipp. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1, no. 2 (2000): Art. 20. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089.
Moosavi, Leon, and Syed Farid Alatas. “The Intellectual Biography of Syed Farid Alatas: Hegemonic Orientations, Epistemic Decolonisation and the School of Autonomous Knowledge.” Current Sociology 72, no. 6 (2024): 1163–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921231194094.
Najib, Muhammad Ainun, and Ahmad Khoirul Fata. “From Wahhabi Pesantren to Progressive Islam: The Socio-Intellectual Legacy of Moeslim Abdurrahman (1948–2012).” Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies 9, no. 1 (2025): 144–71. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v9i1.23507.
Salvatore, Armando. The Sociology of Islam: Knowledge, Power and Civility. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118662601.
Sehlikoglu, Sertaç. “Genealogy, Critique, and Decolonisation: Ibn Khaldun and Moving beyond Filling the Gaps.” Open Research Europe 4 (2024): Article 14, version 2 (May 16, 2025). https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16148.2.
Zulkarnain. “Telaah Kritis Teologi Islam.” Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Theosofi dan Peradaban Islam 4, no. 1 (2022): 74–87. https://doi.org/10.51900/alhikmah.v4i1.11975